User Tools

Site Tools


free_states_movement

<!– NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect Unfree state as #redirect Unfree_State_List. Thank you. –> Free state has two common meanings. One is the older less common meaning in the Antebellum period where a free state was a state where slavery was outlawed.

The second meaning of Free state refers to the American Free States Movement. This is a newer and more common meaning in use since the late 1970's in America among libertarians, conservatives, conservative Christians, Patriots, and Preppers-Survivalists.

Modern "Free States" in the USA

See also: Free states

A modern Free state in the USA can be defined by what it is not, more than what it is.

A free state is not:

List of Free States

The Free States Movement is is picking up steam.

<!– NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect Unfree state as #redirect Unfree_State_List. Thank you. –>

Unfree State List

The list of Unfree states - Nanny States was established by polling readers/listeners of conservative blogs, conservative podcasts, conservative websites, conservative forums, libertarian blogs, preparedness blogs, and gun blogs.<ref>http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=2.0 Accessed March 28, 2014 </ref>

Below is the list with some of their gun grabbing Constitution violating, Oath-breaker liberal Democrat elitist politicians<ref> http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th-2012.html Accessed March 29, 2014</ref> <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_richest_American_politicians Accessed March 29, 2014 </ref><ref> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_wealth Accessed March 29, 2014 </ref>:

“The East Coast and West Coasts had the most liberal states including Vermont, Massachusetts, Delaware, New York, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Maine, California and New Jersey.” <ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie Accessed March 28, 2014</ref>

Qualities of the Free States

Anything buy a Big City in an Unfree State

Alex Barron suggests the following, “There are many people who write me who suggest that they cannot move to JWR’s perfect self-sufficient remote, defensible homestead. The reasons are often similar, money and wife issues. My recommendation to them is often similar. Think of moving to a small town or even the “big city” in a red state. It is my opinion that conservative more traditional leaning states with balanced budgets and a “leave me alone” style will weather what comes next better than many more progressive, heavily indebted, people are use to a safety net from cradle to grave mentality. Would you rather be in Los Angeles or Boise when a significant economic downturn starts? BTW, the first time I visited Boise I thought “where is the city.” Then when we went out to drink later own, I was like, when do we get downtown? They were like, you are “downtown.” Boise doesn’t qualify as a suburb of a major city like Chicago, but it is one of the fastest growing cities in the West. When Idaho, Montana or Wyoming says “big city” it is not what first comes to mind.”<ref>Barron, Alex, “Orofino, Idaho #prepper #homesteading”. Idaho, American Redoubt Charles Carroll Society Podcast</ref>

California in Not a Free State

Alex Barron reports, “In many parts of California people are paying more than $1,000 a month in property tax and what they call Mello-roos. Mello-roos is some form of supplemental tax for things like fire departments and police services. You know what you think your tax dollars already cover. That is $12,000 a year, every year for the privilege of owning property in the state. Many red states have much lower property taxes.”<ref>Barron, Alex, “The advantageous of a modern (neo) homestead #prepper #homesteading”. Idaho, American Redoubt Charles Carroll Society Podcast, Published January 21, 2015. Accessed January 23, 2015</ref>

Walking to Freedom Project

Walking to Freedom is an initiative created by libertarian survivalist podcaster Jack Spirko (The Survival Podcast) where citizens are encouraged to pull up stakes and to move to a more open and free state – to vote with their feet. States are broken down into two categories, the “naughty list and all the rest. People moving out of oppressive states are asked to post a “goodbye letter” addressed to the state and state government officials regarding their decision to move out of their state. On the website's (http://walkingtofreedom.com) Forum groups for the “non-naughty” states are used to welcome people considering or actually moving to that state.

Vision

For a few years Jack Spirko worked with and supported The Free State Project of New Hampshire (http://freestateproject.org) Spirko says, “While it is not in the cards for me to move to New Hampshire the concept to me is the hallmark of a republic. Individual member states band together to form a Federal Republic of States. In our case we call this 'The United States of America'. Citizens have freedom of movement from state to state and the citizen is seen as the most sovereign entity with the most rights, next in the chain is the sovereignty of the member states and at the bottom of the sovereignty chain is the Federal government.

He continues, “Much of this system is broken today, the Federal government is filling many roles it isn't supposed to fill (see Tenth Amendment). State governments then fail to stand up for their citizens or worse they often pile on more big government Nanny state restrictions and encumbrances upon liberty. There is one component of the system though that is still functioning, movement between the states. The final act of a citizen voting in a republic is to vote with their feet. While I love the work being done in New Hampshire, I realized like me there were many people who just can't for one reason or another move there. What dawned on me then though was if we simply create an exodus from the 5-10 worst states it does many things.

  1. “It sends a message to ALL state governments, your citizens understand a republic and their power and are damn well willing to use it. Oppress your citizens and your most valuable producers (citizens and companies) will leave for a better environment.” (See Atlas Shrugged's Galt's Gulch)
  2. “States with more liberty like Idaho, New Hampshire, Wyoming, Montana, Texas, Arizona, etc. will attract more liberty oriented individuals. Not for the purpose of transforming their new home states states but to at minimum hold the line and prevent said states from becoming less libertarian.”
  3. “It makes the entire movement far larger then just The Free State Project or other groups like Free State Wyoming or the American Redoubt movement. By gaining maximum exposure and reach, Walking To Freedom, is a rising tide that will float all boats. It will actually bring more people to states like Wyoming and New Hampshire by fostering competition among the member states.”
  4. “Most current oppression in the US is actually at the Federal level. There are a handful of states that go above and beyond that, it is easier to target those 5-10 on the 'naughty list' and let the other 40-45 states make their case as to why you should move there, then it is to try to get anyone upset with their state to choose a single option as a way out.”
  5. Freedom is highly personal. To some tax freedom is the main concern, others are more concerned with freedom over types of housing, some with freedom to keep and bear arms yet others simply want what I call 'operational freedom'. Operational freedom is simply the freedom to conduct business. Many entrepreneurs are less concerned with the overall tax rates and more concerned with the permits, licenses, fees, hoops one must jump though just to open the doors.”
  6. “By fostering competition among all the states not on the 'naughty list' we have a much larger influence. It brings public awareness to the issue and starts making many states that are at the far end or middle of the spectrum to start thinking about the consequences of being on the naughty list or having the list grow just because they have encouraged us to do so. Yes the list can get bigger in time if necessary. We use 'disapproval voting' to establish the list.”

Spirko elaborates:

Spirko also wants to help with yet another problem:

See Also

Bibliography - Further Reading

  • Skousen, Joel, Strategic Relocation - North American Guide to Safe Places. 3rd Edition Perfect Paperback, 2011, ISBN-10: 1568612621, ISBN-13: 978-1568612621

References

free_states_movement.txt · Last modified: 2020/03/12 18:34 (external edit)